Veo 3.1
vs Seedance 2.5
Compare Veo 3.1 from Google DeepMind and Seedance 2.5 from ByteDance using the inputs, output settings, and live credit prices on ReelMux. Choose by the requirements of your shot and check the exact credit cost before generating.
Which one to pick
Pick Veo 3.1
for spoken dialogue & 4K photorealism
Google DeepMind Veo 3.1 excels at realistic lip-synced dialogue, realistic water/cloth physics, and native 4K mastering.
Pick Seedance 2.5
for faster turnaround & lower credit cost
Seedance 2.5 costs nearly 40% fewer credits per 5-second clip while supporting up to 15 visual references and dynamic camera choreography.
Side-by-side Specifications
| Feature | Veo 3.1 | Seedance 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Creator | Google DeepMind | ByteDance |
| Starting Price | 224 credits (per 5s 1080p clip) | 135 credits (per 5s 1080p clip) |
| Resolutions | 720p, 1080p, 4K | 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K |
| Aspect Ratios | 16:9, 9:16 | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3 |
| Native Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Speed Tier | Cinema Quality | Fast |
Test the same prompt on both models
Extreme macro commercial shot of a skeleton tourbillon mechanical watch emerging from dark liquid gold, gears ticking in crisp synchronization, dramatic rim lighting, 85mm cinema lens.
Sakuga hand-drawn anime sequence: A white-and-lime orbital mecha ignites plasma thrusters on a rain-slicked launchpad, camera shakes violently as shockwaves part the clouds into starry space.